lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: odd bar check errors


From: Sarah k Alawami
Subject: Re: odd bar check errors
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 20:09:30 -0700

Cool cool. Well I think I'm still bar check failing even though I am counting 
the bars right. I put the braces where they should be I think. thanks for the 
advice about repeats though. i think I might or might now write out the shorter 
repeats. but not the longer ones. This is going to be a simple form. nothing 
too complex since the deadline for this is monday. Groans I have a recording if 
anyone wants to write me off list and compare it with output at least the 
melody line once I get my stuff straightened. Let me know.. I want to be sure 
this looks correct in print.

attached is the file.

Attachment: final score.ly
Description: Binary data

On May 11, 2013, at 1:07 PM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:

> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sarah k Alawami" <address@hidden>
> To: "lilly pond discuss discuss" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2013 6:32 PM
> Subject: Re: odd bar check errors
> 
> 
>> What I mean is I want them to go back and repeat the measure once more or at 
>> least that section.  so it should be instead \repeat percent 2 {what ever 
>> that music was} instead of what never Ihad?
> 
> 
> Yes - that would be \repeat percent 2.  However, I really think it's not 
> worth using that notation for such a short repeated phrase - it's so much 
> easier to spell it explicitly, and I think classical musicians don't see this 
> notation often.  I'm now in the 2nd year of a music degree, and I've never 
> seen it used in notation we've been given.
> 
> --
> Phil Holmes 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]