Re: Best practice for parts with varying number of staves

[SoundsFromSound]

Thank you! That sounds like it would be a great utility for many of us
(myself included!)  - 

Ben


Kieren MacMillan wrote
> Hi Urs,
> 
>> How would you approach this scenario?
> 
> I'm working on a mechanism involving \quoteDuring and \RemoveEmptyStaves
> which should handle this scenario "perfectly". Right now, I'm testing it
> with a choral work which variously needs 4 (S+A+T+B), 2 (SA+TB), or 1
> (SATB) staves, depending on the shared content. When it's ready for
> prime-time, I'll be sure to share it with the list for review.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kieren.
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list

> lilypond-user@

> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user





-----
composer | sound designer
--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Best-practice-for-parts-with-varying-number-of-staves-tp145936p145961.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.