|
From: | Phil Holmes |
Subject: | Re: LSR-snippet 878: Customizing individual staff lines |
Date: | Mon, 27 May 2013 11:25:47 +0100 |
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> Cc: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>; <address@hidden> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 11:15 AM Subject: Re: LSR-snippet 878: Customizing individual staff lines
2013/5/27 Phil Holmes <address@hidden>:----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Morley" <address@hidden> To: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> Cc: <address@hidden>; "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2013 10:30 PM Subject: Re: LSR-snippet 878: Customizing individual staff linesPhil, what do you mean? -HarmI don't know which comment you're asking about. -- Phil HolmesSorry, not being clear enough. The question is: What to do with the currently unapproved snippet: https://lsr.di.unimi.it/form.php?type=snippet;id=878;rld=m_snippet David had some serious concerns: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-05/msg00714.html The snippet-author didn't reply (perhaps not on this list) Should I approve this snippet and wait until it breaks? Or ...?
I think it's a bad idea to have snippets with coding errors. People might copy them and then cause problems. I think it should not be approved, and if the author does not contact -user or -devel to find out why it's not visible, then so be it.
-- Phil Holmes --Phil Holmes
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |