|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: One beam, two voices? |
Date: | Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:02:59 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
Am 08.07.2013 15:39, schrieb John
Kliewe:
Obviously I didn't look close enough. I was so focused on the high slur that I didn't realize the difference in beaming :-[ Yes, there is. Your problem is that the b es, ais triplet isn't in the same voice context as the preceding 16th notes, therefore they can't share the beam (as they couldn't share a slur either for example). So what you need to do is get these notes in the same voice . There are two steps involved: 1) Change the polyphonic construct: << { [music one] } \\ { [music two] } >> creates two new Voice contexts whereas << { [music one] } \new Voice { [music two] } >>only creates a new Voice context for 'music two' while 'music one' seamlessly continues the Voice context that has been in effect before (and afterwards. So what you want is to have the triplets that you want to beam in the place of 'music one'. So: 2) Switch the expressions: Try replacing the triplet section with << { \voiceTwo \times 2/3 { { b16 eis, ais } } } \new Voice { \once \override TupletNumber #'stencil = ##f \times 2/3 { b16^\accent[ s ais] } } >>and it should work. Notice the \voiceTwo which is necessary now to switch the stems downward, and the circumflex to place the accent above the voice. HTH Urs
|
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |