Re: Pattern-generating Scheme function challenge

[Urs Liska]

Please ask Mr. Aldridge about that ;-)

I assume it is the 'pattern number', not the binary number. So he probably started with 1, not 0, although I don't see much use in the two first patterns anyway.

Urs

Jim Long <address@hidden> schrieb:

On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 04:03:25PM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:

For each number in the range it should:
- produce a LilyPond pattern corresponding to the binary representation 
of the given number

It may be my misunderstanding, but is the number below the systems
meant to indicate the number whose binary representation is being used?
The PDF's musical examples show representations of 72-75, but the
numbers at the bottom are 7.73-7.76.

-- 
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.