|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: Henle piano template |
Date: | Mon, 29 Jul 2013 21:04:34 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 |
Am 29.07.2013 20:04, schrieb PMA:
But I think what we are aiming at here is a reproduction of a given score/edition, in the current case Henle's Edition of Beethoven op. 10/3. Whether an Urtext edition should or should not contain editorial fingerings - or whatever editorial decisions you might to name - isn't the question at hand. This is a complex issue which would probably have been answered quite differently if you ask it 1950, 1980 or today. I really vote for working towards the 'style', at least at the moment. And for that the fingering style of Henle's edition should be part of the challenge, especially as good engraving of fingerings isn't trivial.Urs Liska wrote:No, these don't, but I think that fingerings in itself _do_ belong in there, and if the original ones from Henle are copyrighted ...It seems to me that the only fingerings properly belonging in an Urtext edition are those of the composer. If he / she supplied none, then _none_.
Urs
PA _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |