[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Slurs end point need to be different when going up & down
From: |
Eluze |
Subject: |
Re: Slurs end point need to be different when going up & down |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jul 2013 13:53:44 -0700 (PDT) |
MarcM wrote
> If we compare slurs in original scores. We can see that when the second
> note included in the slur is going up, the end point of the slur ends on a
> south west point.
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n148490/slurs_in_score_from_1910_UP.png>
>
> When the interval goes down, the end point of the slur ends on a south
> east point of the note.
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n148490/slurs_in_score_from_1910_DOWN.png>
>
> Slurs in lilypond are pretty close when the internal is going up. However
> when the interval is going down, the end point is such that the slur
> appears to miss the note:
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n148490/slurs_in_lilypond.png>
>
>
> I was initially going to tweak the slur but we should not have to do that
> for every slur going down.
I think there are lots of styles to attach slurs to noteheads or stems and I
don't know of valid rules.
where is your example from? I know other scores where slurs look quite
different.
if you like you can specify or propose a new style as a feature request.
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Slurs-end-point-need-to-be-different-when-going-up-down-tp148490p148534.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.