[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software
From: |
Janek Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Aug 2013 10:54:17 +0200 |
[lots of discussion about LilyPond vs other notation software]
Hi people,
it seems that i've missed an important discussion. After reading it
(and reading comments on the Steinberg blog), i decided to add my
comment in the form of a blog post:
http://lilypondblog.org/2013/08/honestly-is-lilypond-good-enough/
I'd be interested in hearing your opinions in the comments!
best,
Janek
- Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software, (continued)
- Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software, Phil Holmes, 2013/08/08
- Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software, David Kastrup, 2013/08/08
- Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software, David Kastrup, 2013/08/08
- Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software, Urs Liska, 2013/08/08
- Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software, David Kastrup, 2013/08/08
- Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2013/08/09
- Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software,
Janek Warchoł <=
- Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software, Jacques Menu, 2013/08/14
- Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software, Andrew Bernard, 2013/08/14
- Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software, Janek Warchoł, 2013/08/14
- Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software, SoundsFromSound, 2013/08/08
Re: Steinberg's progress report on new notation software, Tim Reeves, 2013/08/08