[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: purpose of commands
From: |
Mark Stephen Mrotek |
Subject: |
RE: purpose of commands |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Aug 2013 02:51:58 -0700 |
Phil Holmes,
Thanks for your work on the manual. I learn a lot from it and that which I
do not understand the other users help me!
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Holmes [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 1:49 AM
To: Trevor Daniels; Mark Stephen Mrotek; address@hidden
Subject: Re: purpose of commands
----- Original Message -----
From: "Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden>
To: "Mark Stephen Mrotek" <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, August 18, 2013 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: purpose of commands
> Hi Mark
>
> This snippet is rather contrived and misleading. I think it should be
> removed from the docs, or at least replaced with one which shows when the
> definition of voiceFive is really necessary - when explicitly defining
> voices.
>
> First, the \voicexxx commands are unnecessary when using the << {}\\{}>>
> construct. They have to be placed here only because the voices are
> entered in the incorrect order. If instead the five voices are entered
> from voice one to voice five in order omitting voice four everything works
> fine without having to define \voiceFive, as shown below. The bar "||"
> has no effect in the position shown. It should be at the end of one of
> the five music expressions.
I've updated the LSR with the explicit voice version and deleted the errant
bar line completely. The docs will pick up this update in due course.
--
Phil Holmes