[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new to lilypond
From: |
James Harkins |
Subject: |
Re: new to lilypond |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:31:35 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Phil Holmes <mail <at> philholmes.net> writes:
> I think a lot of us simply use the Dutch standard of es for a flat and is
> for a sharp - I certainly do.
I'll be bold and disagree. G-flat is ges in Dutch (3 characters) and gf in
English (2 characters). If you're typesetting a piece in D-flat major, the 33%
redundancy for every black-key note in Dutch will add up quickly.
I've been dealing with repetitive strain injuries for more than half my life
now, so I have a rather strong aversion toward extra symbols, such as the "s"
in -es and -is, which are identical between flats and sharps and thereby do
nothing to distinguish them. They take up space but don't /do/ anything in
return for the extra finger effort. If I were forced to type them, I would
seek another input method. Fortunately I can just set the language to English
and then enjoy more efficient input.
(For longer keywords, Frescobaldi's auto-completion is a lifesaver.)
hjh
- new to lilypond, Stephanie, 2013/08/19
- Re: new to lilypond, David Kastrup, 2013/08/19
- Re: new to lilypond, Andrew Bernard, 2013/08/19
- Re: new to lilypond, Thomas Morley, 2013/08/19
- Re: new to lilypond, Phil Holmes, 2013/08/19
- Re: new to lilypond,
James Harkins <=
- Re: new to lilypond, Andrew Bernard, 2013/08/19
- Re: new to lilypond, Carl Peterson, 2013/08/19
- Re: new to lilypond, James Harkins, 2013/08/19
- Re: new to lilypond, David Kastrup, 2013/08/20
- Re: new to lilypond, Trevor Daniels, 2013/08/20
- Re: new to lilypond, Janek WarchoĊ, 2013/08/20