Re: Testers needed for 'lilyglyphs' package

[Urs Liska]

Am 02.09.2013 16:40, schrieb flup2:
> Hello,
>
> I'll take some time later this week to look carefully, but a first good news
> is that I was able to compile the manual after installing the missing fonts
> on 2 different computers :-)
That's very good to know. I didn't have concrete doubts, but LaTeX is 
always good for a surprise ;-)
> 2 years ago, I developed such a package (far less complete!) targeted to
> LaTeX (not Xe- or Lua-)
Ah, yes, I recall having looked at that last year when I started on 
lilyglyphs.
> and I see your work as an opportunity to look at
> XeLaTeX.
I suggest also looking at LuaLaTeX at this opportunity.
One thing I missed from XeLaTeX were a few very advanced typographic 
features.
The fact that out of the blue I got a contribution by Dave Bellows who 
made lilyglyphs work with LuaLaTeX too actually triggered tackling a 
release now ...
> I'll take a look at glyphs combinations that could be usefull; octaviation
> clefs, for instance.
Any contribution is highly welcome, as one part of the task at hand is 
to increase the glyph coverage. And I'll surely work on that mainly with 
my own practical needs in mind. So if there are many people submitting 
predefined commands the package can grow significantly faster.
(I wouldn't try to create octaviation clefs on the LaTeX side but 
definitely through the pdf images BTW).

Best
Urs
> Thanks for your awesome work!
>
> Philippe
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Testers-needed-for-lilyglyphs-package-tp150091p150102.html
> Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user