lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Double slurs on automatic part combining


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Double slurs on automatic part combining
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 04:11:28 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)

Carl Peterson <address@hidden> writes:

> On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 9:44 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Carl Peterson <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > I am using the automatic part combiner in preparing SATB hymn sheets. The
>> > issue I have is that when the notes are chorded by the apc, if there is a
>> > slur (in both parts), only one slur is printed (as is seen in the
>> > documentation for automatic part combining).
>>
>> Why would you use the part combiner?  I know SATB as basically
>>
>> \new ChoirStaff
>> << \new Staff { \clef "treble" << { \soprano } \\ { \alto } >> }
>>    \new Staff { \clef "bass" << { \tenor } \\ { \bass } >> }
>> >>
>>
>
> That depends. Virtually without exception, every hymnal I have used in
> church or have in my library uses joined stems except when there are
> different melodies or the notes are separated by less than a diatonic third
> (this has required some rewriting of the part combiner scheme file
> to accommodate these style rules).

Well, this is probably going nowhere fast, but it's moderately amusing
that it seems to do something:

soprano = \relative c'' { e( f) c( d) }
alto = \relative c'' { c( d) c( d) }
\new Staff \with { \consists "Stem_engraver" }
<< \new Voice \with { \remove "Stem_engraver" \voiceOne } \soprano
   \new Voice \with { \remove "Stem_engraver" \voiceTwo } \alto
>>

-- 
David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]