Re: Double slurs on automatic part combining

[Carl Peterson]

On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 10:11 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:

Well, this is probably going nowhere fast, but it's moderately amusing
that it seems to do something:

Agreed on both counts.

This probably means that if it bothers me enough, I'm going to have to go back into the part-combiner.scm file and dissect it. While my hands are in the patient, I might as well figure out how to get it to combine tied and slurred notes (such as on a suspension). The code for both is probably in the same general vicinity.

The question is whether it bothers me enough, or if I'm willing to either put up with the individual tweaks or letting the current default output be what it is.