[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Windows registry, Python, and LilyPond
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: Windows registry, Python, and LilyPond |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:22:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) |
Frederick Bartlett writes:
> I think what I'm looking for is a Windows installation whereby LilyPond's
> python scripts are run by its own python.exe, while all other python scripts
> are run by the system's python.
>
> This is likely not possible under Windows. *sigh*
What if all our python scripts were named .pylily (or .pyly whatever)
and bind .pylily to LilyPond's python. Wouldn't that work?
However, I think we should strive to have python-version-independent
python scripts, that should be doable too. See the TODO in GUB
and the actual code for a list of tricks needed to support python2+3.
https://github.com/janneke/gub/blob/master/TODO
Greetings, Jan
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | AvatarĀ® http://AvatarAcademy.nl
- Re: Windows registry, Python, and LilyPond, (continued)
- Re: Windows registry, Python, and LilyPond, Frederick Bartlett, 2013/09/12
- Re: Windows registry, Python, and LilyPond, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/12
- Re: Windows registry, Python, and LilyPond, Frederick Bartlett, 2013/09/12
- Re: Windows registry, Python, and LilyPond, Phil Holmes, 2013/09/12
Re: Windows registry, Python, and LilyPond, Hilary Snaden, 2013/09/12
Re: Windows registry, Python, and LilyPond, Tim Roberts, 2013/09/12
Re: Windows registry, Python, and LilyPond, Frederick Bartlett, 2013/09/13
Re: Windows registry, Python, and LilyPond, Frederick Bartlett, 2013/09/15