Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:35:33 -0400
From: Jim Tisdall <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Subject: fingering problem with Note_heads_engraver
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I've come across the following problem using
Note_heads_engraver (and the Completion_rests_engraver)
on a guitar score that includes fingering.
The following score rewrites notes that span a quarter-note
beat as two notes with a tie. That's what I want ...
but it also duplicates the fingering on the new, second,
tied note ... which is not desirable.
\version "2.16.2" % also with latest development version
\header {
piece = "demonstrate fingering problem with Note_heads_engraver"
}
\score {
\new Staff {
\time 3/4
\key c \major
\clef "treble_8"
\new Voice \with {
\remove "Note_heads_engraver"
\consists "Completion_heads_engraver" completionUnit =
#(ly:make-moment 1/4)
% \remove "Rest_engraver"
% \consists "Completion_rest_engraver" completionUnit =
#(ly:make-moment 1/4)
}
{
% fingers are represented by e.g. -3 for the 3rd finger
% strings are represented by e.g. \5 for the 5th
string (in a circle)
% the following line duplicates string and finger
<g,\6-3>8 <c\5-4>4 <e\4-2>4.
% the following line duplicates string only (not
finger)
g,8\6-3 c4\5-4 e4.\4-2
}
}
\layout {
}
}
Send lilypond-user mailing list submissions to
address@hidden
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
address@hidden
You can reach the person managing the list at
address@hidden
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note splitting
(Gilberto Agostinho)
2. Re:Two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note
splitting (David Kastrup)
3. Re:Two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note
splitting (SoundsFromSound)
4. Re:Two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note
splitting (Phil Holmes)
5. Re:Two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note
splitting (David Kastrup)
6. Re:Two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note
splitting (Gilberto Agostinho)
7. Re:Hairpin with pro/preceeding text (EdBeesley)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:45:08 +0200
From: Gilberto Agostinho <address@hidden>
To: lilypond-user <address@hidden>
Subject: Two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note splitting
Message-ID:
<address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hello,
I think I found two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note
splitting.
1) when a note has an accidental and it has to be split, the ligaturas look
out of place.
2) when a note has an accidental (regular accidental, or forced accidental
with an !, or even due to *dodecaphonic style*) and it has to be split,
these accidentals appear in all repeated notes.
Here is an example:
\version "2.17.26"
\markup {This works perfectly well}
\new Voice \with {
\remove "Note_heads_engraver"
\consists "Completion_heads_engraver"
\remove "Rest_engraver"
\consists "Completion_rest_engraver"
}
{
g'2\pp~g'8. f'1\mf a''2..\mf cis''4..\ff
}
\markup {But this don't, the ligaturas are out of place when notes have
accidentals}
\new Voice \with {
\remove "Note_heads_engraver"
\consists "Completion_heads_engraver"
\remove "Rest_engraver"
\consists "Completion_rest_engraver"
}
{
g'2\pp~g'8. fis'1\mf aes''2..\mf cis''4..\ff
}
\markup {Also, accidentals (including forced ones with ! and with
dodecaphonic style) are repeated for all notes...}
\new Voice \with {
\remove "Note_heads_engraver"
\consists "Completion_heads_engraver"
\remove "Rest_engraver"
\consists "Completion_rest_engraver"
}
{
g'2\pp~g'8. f'!1\mf
#(set-accidental-style 'dodecaphonic)
a''2..\mf cis''4..\ff
}
The result can be seen on this link:
http://s18.postimg.org/aty44yta1/split.png
So are these bugs or am I misusing the rhythm splitting?
Thanks a lot,
Gilberto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/attachments/20131002/1def4623/attachment.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:03:28 +0200
From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
To: Gilberto Agostinho <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden, lilypond-user <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note
splitting
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain
Gilberto Agostinho <address@hidden> writes:
I think I found two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note
splitting.
1) when a note has an accidental and it has to be split, the ligaturas look
out of place.
2) when a note has an accidental (regular accidental, or forced accidental
with an !, or even due to *dodecaphonic style*) and it has to be split,
these accidentals appear in all repeated notes.
So are these bugs or am I misusing the rhythm splitting?
Bugs. Regressions. In 2.16.0, everything looks fine except for the
repeated forced accidentals (those have always been overlooked, I
guess).
Bug squad, can you file the original report and the examples? And can
people who have some version of 2.17 installed narrow this in some more?
I don't really fancy bisecting all the way from 2.16.