[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Financing LilyPond work (was: Unfamiliar articulation symbol (David Kast
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Financing LilyPond work (was: Unfamiliar articulation symbol (David Kastrup)) |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Oct 2013 09:54:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
SoundsFromSound <address@hidden> writes:
> Guy,
>
> I know what you mean. David is always very helpful, always willing to lend a
> hand, and I've yet to stump him on anything so far! :)
Well, it's easy to pretend not being stumped if the source code is
available...
> The entire LilyPond team deserves a *huge *thanks for all the hard
> work they have done for the community, and for the dedication they
> continue to show each and every day as LilyPond evolves.
Let me usurp the opportunity to point out that David is being _paid_ by
a subset of the LilyPond community for being helpful (I'd point to the
page explaining my personal situation in more detail, but
news.lilynet.net is non-operative at the moment. I might have a LaTeXed
draft available if you are interested, however). And that a rather
large part of his payment comes from people who have already invested
quite large amounts of time and effort in LilyPond.
Of course, who else would be enthusiastic enough to also invest money?
I am a bit behind in my reports, but I'll attach the latest one (which
is not actually the best sales pitch since July was a bit like pulling
teeth). But maybe git gives a better sales pitch:
git shortlog -n -s --since "1 year ago"
434 David Kastrup
175 Phil Holmes
80 Jean-Charles Malahieude
69 Francisco Vila
55 Keith OHara
49 Trevor Daniels
42 Mike Solomon
41 Julien Rioux
19 James Lowe
16 Federico Bruni
15 Benkő Pál
15 Marc Hohl
14 Janek Warchoł
13 Mark Polesky
13 Thomas Morley
13 Werner Lemberg
[...]
Of course, if you actually sum all other commits, you'll find that while
my paid work is the single largest item, it is only a fraction of what
actually is being done. And of course, commits range from trivial to
complex. And removing the --since option shows that we are actually
talking about standing on the shoulders of giants here:
6382 Han-Wen Nienhuys
3225 Graham Percival
2476 Jan Nieuwenhuizen
1508 Francisco Vila
1311 John Mandereau
932 David Kastrup
917 Reinhold Kainhofer
785 Joe Neeman
598 Werner Lemberg
585 Jean-Charles Malahieude
583 Trevor Daniels
At any rate, if you can't think of any better way to contribute to
LilyPond than keeping me on the project, check out the report and think
whether you'd like to pitch in. A non-trivial part of my current
numbers comes from a rather staggering one-time contribution this
spring, but that will run out sometime late next year and without other
payments picking up, this will be hard to sustain. To put some
perspective to it: my last "regular" job paid about 4 times (plus half
of social security which I have to cover whole now) what I am trying to
get somewhat regularly now. Of course, I can work from home and on
stuff I like, but even taking that into account I can consider me a net
contributor without bad conscience.
At least at the current rates...
Feel free to contact me for my account data if you want to shift the
balance...
All the best
--
David Kastrup
jul13.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document