[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Oct 2013 18:59:06 +0200 |
On 8 Oct 2013, at 09:41, Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:
> One thing you'd have to consider is that it isn't _always_ appropriate to
> start the enharmonic change at exactly the same position. I've encountered
> several instances where I had to change one voice later than the others or
> split a long note into two enharmonically equivalent ones and add a Tie over
> them (or rather a fake Tie/Slur, just another issue …).
Strictly speaking, you are indicating where you want the pitch to slip.
- Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, (continued)
Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/10/07
Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, David Kastrup, 2013/10/07
- Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/10/07
- Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/10/07
- Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, David Kastrup, 2013/10/07
- Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/10/07
- Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, David Kastrup, 2013/10/07
- Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, Urs Liska, 2013/10/08
- Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures,
Hans Aberg <=
Re: "smart" transposition of key signatures, Janek Warchoł, 2013/10/07