[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: New, more powerful version of \shape! |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Oct 2013 09:13:57 -0400 |
Hi Janek,
> Could you send me a few examples of the old behavior (lilypond code,
> lilypond output, documentation) so that i could quickly estimate the
> difficulty of the task?
Unfortunately, the docs and download archive only goes back to v2.6, and I'm
pretty sure we lost Slur #'attachment in v2.4.2, if not earlier.
Here's a search of the list (showing others who feel/felt the same way as I did
when the feature was withdrawn):
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=slur+attachment&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-user&max=20&result=normal&sort=score>
The old behaviour was, for example,
\override Slur #'attachment = #'(head . stem)
to force the slur to go from the [left-hand] notehead to the [right-hand] stem
tip.
In a new implementation it could, I suppose, simply calculate the corresponding
positions and modify Slur.positions accordingly. In any case, a setting like
this would save a huge amount of manual effort and trial&error.
BONUS: I would love for something like the following: "stem" is a constant -1,
"head" is a constant +1, so one could use
\override Slur #'attachment = #'(L . R)
where L and R are numbers representing the position ***relative to 0, which is
the center of the stem***.
Does all that make sense?
Thanks,
Kieren.
- New, more powerful version of \shape!, Janek Warchoł, 2013/10/17
- Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2013/10/17
- Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!, Gilberto Agostinho, 2013/10/17
- Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!, SoundsFromSound, 2013/10/17
- Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/10/17
- Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!, Urs Liska, 2013/10/17
- Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!, David Nalesnik, 2013/10/17
- Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!, Paul Morris, 2013/10/17
- Re: New, more powerful version of \shape!, David Kastrup, 2013/10/18