[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Citing Lilypond in a paper?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Citing Lilypond in a paper? |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Oct 2013 06:31:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
ryanmichaelmcclure <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thank you for your response. I have a few quick questions about this
> quickly:
>
> Who should I put as the creator of the software at the beginning? Would this
> be the way I should do it, in your opinion?
>
> CREATOR INFORMATION (2013). Lilypond (Version 2.17.29) [Software]. Available
> from http://lilypond.org/download.html
>
> Thank you for your help. My teacher isn't a huge stickler for MLA, but it's
> good to get practice before I find someone who is. :)
Well, LilyPond is a huge collaborative effort. With regard to
attribution, it is common to explicitly credit the two original authors,
namely
Han-Wen Nienhuys, Jan Niewenhuizen, et al.
That makes more sense than a full list.
--
David Kastrup