|
From: | Peter Bjuhr |
Subject: | Re: Beam positions and time signature spacing |
Date: | Fri, 08 Nov 2013 20:32:15 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 |
On 11/08/2013 08:03 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Hi Peter!Thanks a lot for the scan. I would say that even though she doesn't condemns her example a), she still considers b) as bad and c) as the best compromise.My corrections above are all similar to her example c)
I interpret her as saying that a) is the best solution but c) is a usable compromise if one want the angle as in b).
This issue came to me while showing one of my compositions to a friend of mine who used to work at Bärenreiter. His opinions are exactly what I reproduced on my question above. Also, looking at my G Henle Verlageditions, I noticed that beams such as of type a) indeed do appear from timeto time, but they are somehow rare. The majority of beams are: straight,slightly angled but covering the staff lines or positioned above/below thestaff lines (where any angle can take place).
Maybe this is a Bärenreiter house rule rather than a general convention!? Best Peter
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |