Re: Beam positions and time signature spacing

[Peter Bjuhr]

On 11/11/2013 12:53 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
> > Here the accidental could be mistakenly taken for a part of the key
> > signature if it's too close. (The example appears fine to me when I
> > compile it, but I would like to mention it anyway.)
> I think the worst case on my .PNG image was the one "with clef and with more
> accidentals", where there is basically no spacing at all between the clef
> and the accidentals! The example you posted also seems to me to be rather
> close to the key signature.

Gilberto, could you do the exact measurement also on this last example I 
posted? I think it would be interesting. I seemed to me that the 
confusion I mentioned as a possible problem was quite far-fetched in the 
actual result. (I can post the scan from Gould on this if you like!?)

Best
Peter