Re: Reminder accidentals with octaviation

[pls]

On 20.11.2013, at 12:25, Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> please consider the situation in the attached (or inline?) image.
> 
> <eecjhibe.png>
> 
> a chord is repeated an octave higher, which is indicated by an \ottava.
> Does the repeated chord need accidentals or not?
> Both accidentals in the first chord are necessary (not reminder) accidentals, 
> so the repeated chord actually has _different_ notes and should need 
> accidentals of its own. But somehow it seems ridiculous to print them again 
> at the same staff position.
> 
> Are there rules for this? Do you have any opinions?
Gould's gut feeling says you should "repeat an accidental if sounding at a 
different octave, even when the same pitch is used with an octave sign".