Re: Denemo-feedback

[Urs Liska]

Federico Bruni <address@hidden> schrieb:
>>
>> On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 01:20 +0100, Noeck wrote:
>> > several times now, I looked at Denemo (about twice a year for the
>last 4
>> > years). So I can only share a first impression. As background info:
>I
>> > probably always will prefer text input and I like Frescobaldi very
>much.
>> > But I think that a GUI is definitely needed for the average
>musician. My
>> > approach: A GUI program should be self explaining - I did not read
>the
>> > manual. Denemo version 0.9.2 (latest ubuntu).
>>
>
>HI Noeck
>
>I'm in the same situation: I'm more than happy with text input and
>Frescobaldi, but I get interested in Denemo because I want to spread
>the
>use of LilyPond and I think that we need a GUI for this.
>
>Denemo is improved a lot in the last months.
>One interesting feature of Denemo (missing in Frescobaldi, at the
>moment)
>is instant compile.

It's on the wish list for some time.
Another thing which will probably make instant compilation easier to realize is 
moving the music view to svg. On the long run this will lead to be able to 
graphically edit the result from a lilypond run, inserting the respective 
tweaks into the input files. Of course it will be a long way until that's near 
comprehensive, but if we start with tweaking slurs, fixing pitches or drawing 
spanners it will be more than a good start.

>
>I'm not using Denemo, sometimes I compile it and do a few tests just to
>check the translation.
>But I think that it's worth trying it again.
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user