Re: Different beaming for triplets

[David Kastrup]

Richard Shann <address@hidden> writes:

> Thank you David (and to the others that replied), I had a go at
> getting my head round this before I asked, I find it a serious
> challenge.

Yes.

> It would be nice to have a graphical way of selecting what you want
> visually and letting the computer do the hard work...

> Your new 2.19 syntax certainly looks an improvement!

Note:

>> \beamExceptions { 8[ 8 8] | \repeat unfold 3 \tuplet 3/2 { 16[ 16 16] } }
rather than
>> #'((end . (((1 . 8) . (3)) ((1 . 24) . (3 3 3)))))

Well, you can also write

\beamExceptions { c8[ c c] | \repeat unfold 3 \tuplet 3/2 { c16[ c c] } }

which will look more familiar.  But I am rather fond of the 2.19 way of
being able to enter rhythms without the distraction of pitches.

-- 
David Kastrup