[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: still no ultimate way to create three-staff piano layout
From: |
Karol Majewski |
Subject: |
Re: still no ultimate way to create three-staff piano layout |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Dec 2013 11:23:00 +0100 |
Hi Eluze,
it works, but only if all three piano-staves are visible. When staff 'c' is
empty (hidden), distance between 'b' and 'd' is smaller than it should be. No
idea how to solve this...
=====================
\version "2.17.96"
music = {
c'1
}
musicEmpty = {
R1
}
\score {
<<
\new StaffGroup \with { systemStartDelimiter = #'SystemStartBrace
\override StaffGrouper.staffgroup-staff-spacing.basic-distance = #10.5
} <<
\new PianoStaff \with {
\remove "Span_bar_engraver"
\remove "System_start_delimiter_engraver"
\override StaffGrouper.staffgroup-staff-spacing.basic-distance = #9
} <<
\new Staff \with {
instrumentName = #"a"
} \music
\new Staff \with {
instrumentName = #"b"
} \music
>>
\new Staff \with {
instrumentName = #"c"
\RemoveEmptyStaves
\override VerticalAxisGroup.remove-first = ##t
} \musicEmpty
>>
\new StaffGroup <<
\new Staff \with {
instrumentName = #"d"
} \music
\new Staff \with {
instrumentName = #"e"
} \music
\new Staff \with {
instrumentName = #"f"
} \music
>>
>>
}
=====================
> karol wrote
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm still working on ultimate three-staff piano layout. When I write
> > piano-solo music it works fine. The problem occures when I add another
> > StaffGroup:
>
> you probably have to override the values for the staff grouper:
>
> \score {
> <<
> \new StaffGroup \with {
> \override StaffGrouper.staffgroup-staff-spacing.basic-distance = #44
> systemStartDelimiter = #'SystemStartSquare
> }
> <<
> \new PianoStaff \with{
> \override StaffGrouper.staffgroup-staff-spacing.basic-distance = 55
> }
> <<
> \new Staff \music
> \new Staff \music
> \new Staff \music
> >>
> \new Staff \music
> >>
> \new StaffGroup <<
> \new Staff \music
> \new Staff \music
> \new Staff \music
> >>
> >>
> }
>
> does this work for you?
>
> Eluze
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/still-no-ultimate-way-to-create-three-staff-piano-layout-tp153648p155355.html
> Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Re: still no ultimate way to create three-staff piano layout, Karol Majewski, 2013/12/08
- Re: still no ultimate way to create three-staff piano layout, Eluze, 2013/12/08
- Re: still no ultimate way to create three-staff piano layout,
Karol Majewski <=
- Re: still no ultimate way to create three-staff piano layout, Eluze, 2013/12/08
- Re: still no ultimate way to create three-staff piano layout, Karol Majewski, 2013/12/08
- Re: still no ultimate way to create three-staff piano layout, Eluze, 2013/12/09
- Re: still no ultimate way to create three-staff piano layout, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/12/09
- Re: still no ultimate way to create three-staff piano layout, Keith OHara, 2013/12/16
- Re: still no ultimate way to create three-staff piano layout, David Kastrup, 2013/12/16
- Re: still no ultimate way to create three-staff piano layout, Keith OHara, 2013/12/16
- Re: still no ultimate way to create three-staff piano layout, David Kastrup, 2013/12/16