Re: Problems with LilyJAZZ.ily

[David Kastrup]

Curt <address@hidden> writes:

> In his initial announcement, he wrote, "At any rate, the whole
> LilyJAZZ issue shall be open and free (just like Lilypond)..."
>
> Is that not enough?
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-03/msg00647.html

"Shall be" does not state when.  It's certainly not a replacement for a
formal submission.  If someone finds a way to get hold of the author and
get him to place the thing in some public place with a clear license
statement, it would not get lost in case he becomes harder to reach.

-- 
David Kastrup