|
From: | Anthonys Lists |
Subject: | Re: A thought on Windows Experience |
Date: | Mon, 09 Dec 2013 21:49:35 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 |
On 09/12/2013 06:12, James Harkins
wrote:
My flippant response makes it sound like any reasonably intelligent person would find the right information fairly quickly, casting the problem in terms of user carelessness. That was a misstatement. My point is that reasonably intelligent, reasonably careful readers can visit lilypond.org and get from it no strong feeling for the importance of downloading a dedicated editor *in addition to* LilyPond itself. Don't forget, also, that PEOPLE ARE DIFFERENT. Off-topic slightly, but read Feynmann on keeping time in your head. The task was "count from 1 to 60 in your head and keep consistent time". MOST people can do that while watching TV, come in bang on time, and answer questions on what they have seen. MOST people, if you hold a conversation with them, either they ignore you or their time-keeping goes to pot. Feynmann was surprised that some of his fellow students could hold a conversation no problem - but watching TV trashed their time-keeping! Turns out MOST people count in their head using "silent talking". Make them talk, and they can't keep time. But SOME people watch a ticker-tape, and have no trouble talking. Disrupt their visual sense, however, and they're in trouble...
Are the manual pages in a suitable format? I HATE Word, because its mental map is not mine. On the other hand, I switched to WordPerfect no trouble - it has a different mental map that meshes with mine almost perfectly. The more WP tries to ape Word, the harder it becomes for me to use it. Likewise, I have no trouble using lilypond's *P*D*F* manuals. My mind is very text-oriented. But I HATE HYPERTEXT. My IQ is off the scale (not really, but I'm in the top few percent of the population), but give me a web-site and if what I'm looking for is not staring me in the face, then I have difficulty finding it. So you can NOT conclude that a "reasonably intelligent" visitor will be able to find what they're looking for. I'm "extremely intelligent" and I have difficulty. And I doubt I'm alone ... Cheers, Wol |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |