|
From: | Phil Holmes |
Subject: | Re: survey on multiple development versions |
Date: | Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:51:29 -0000 |
If we have branches with personal interests, it must become more feasible for the respective authors with personal interests to provide binaries if they consider that a good idea. Any solution that will only work via the "Phil, do more" route is not going to scale. -- David Kastrup
I think it would potentially be feasible to have a page with a variety of builds of single binary types. This could potentially be managed a la patchy, but the question is: if we had a set of, say Linux x86 builds to try out, would people bother?
It might make more sense to think about improved ways of creating stable releases during a continuing development cycle.
--Phil Holmes
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |