|
From: | Guy Stalnaker |
Subject: | Re: news.lilynet.net links on lilypond.org main page |
Date: | Sun, 15 Dec 2013 14:02:01 -0600 |
Lilynet.net is not an official part of the lilypond infrastructure - it was set up by Valentin - check whois. Lilypond.org is the official presence and is maintained by the project.
--
Phil Holmes----- Original Message -----From: Guy StalnakerTo: Federico BruniSent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 7:05 PMSubject: Re: news.lilynet.net links on lilypond.org main pageBTW - what lead me to lilypond.org was a desire to give a contribution to its development. The text for the new item for 2012 meeting mentions contributions for David's work. It was clicking on the link that showed lilynet.net was broken.
Guy Stalnaker
address@hidden
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Guy Stalnaker <address@hidden> wrote:
If he is not amendable to contact via email or this list it seems unlikely he's amendable to contact via Twitter DM. The situation bodes ill for long-term website viability. I know the organization is cash-strapped, but perhaps shifting to a more supported/supportable web site venue seems wise. Are the "owners" of lilypond.org and lilynet.net still involved in the project? There are a plethora of hosting sites that offer CMS capabilities and unlimited storage for <$200/year (hostforweb.com is one such company with whom I manage a website for a local choral organization). I know the lilypond content is both extensive and complicated, but having an incommunicative site editor seems, to put it mildly, problematic.
Guy Stalnaker
address@hidden
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Federico Bruni <address@hidden> wrote:
he is very active on twitter:has anyone with a twitter account tried to contact him?
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |