Re: RehearsalMark and MetronomeM ark together…again…

[Paul Scott]

On Sun, Dec 01, 2013 at 10:57:25AM -0500, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> Follow-up…
> Cancel the bounty call for now: I’ve hacked my way through the 
> problem manually.

My hack has been to add the tempo markings etc. to a manual generation 
of the Rehearsal Mark.  Do you have time to tell me what your hack is?

Now that the semester is over maybe I can write scheme code to incorporate 
Lily's automatic rehearsal mark incrementing and make my hack easier.

Paul

> I’ll post a feature request (and new bounty offer) some time next month.
> 
> Thanks,
> Kieren.
> 
> On 2013-Dec-1, at 09:46, Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > Hello all,
> > 
> > This is *killing* my productivity on my current [extremely-high-pressure, 
> > past-due] project…
> > 
> > For one example (hardly the worst), here’s Lilypond’s default output from 
> > one section of my bass part:
> > 
> > <Screen Shot 2013-12-01 at 09.43.13.png>
> > 
> > Can someone please whip me up a helper function which does the following:
> >    1. automatically offsets MetronomeMarks to the right enough to slide 
> > down next to a concurrent RehearsalMark; and
> >    2. automatically stretches a MultiMeasureRest under a MetronomeMark such 
> > that it is sufficiently wide to incorporate the entire MetronomeMark.
> > 
> > I am, of course, willing to pay a small bounty — bigger, if it’s a fix that 
> > can easily be incorporated into the main codebase.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Kieren.
> > _______________________________________________
> > lilypond-user mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>