[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: delayed turn
From: |
Mark Stephen Mrotek |
Subject: |
RE: delayed turn |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Dec 2013 01:50:38 -0800 |
Eluze,
It is here,
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-12/txtHVW62yOy_y.txt
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden
[mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of
Eluze
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2013 1:36 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: RE: delayed turn
Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote
> The length of the code was to demonstrate the inconsistencies, i.e.,
> nine separate instances produce randomly two different results.
you can write \repeat unfold 9 {...} so the reader is sure there is no
(inadvertent) change in the code.
> Why is it that the code presented in the manual ( and copied in my
> exampled) does not produce in my work the same as is in the manual?
I couldn't find your example with turns and fingering.
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/delayed-turn-tp156135p156165.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Re: delayed turn, (continued)
- Re: delayed turn, Eluze, 2013/12/19
- Re: delayed turn, Alex Loomis, 2013/12/19
- RE: delayed turn, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2013/12/19
- RE: delayed turn, Eluze, 2013/12/20
- Re: delayed turn, Simon Bailey, 2013/12/20
- RE: delayed turn, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2013/12/20
- Re: delayed turn, Simon Bailey, 2013/12/20
- RE: delayed turn, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2013/12/20
- RE: delayed turn,
Mark Stephen Mrotek <=
- RE: delayed turn, Eluze, 2013/12/20
- RE: delayed turn, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2013/12/20
- RE: delayed turn, Eluze, 2013/12/20
- RE: delayed turn, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2013/12/20
- RE: delayed turn, Eluze, 2013/12/20