Re: autochange and tuplet brackets

[Simon Bailey]

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 11:05 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:

Not really: what's discussed in that thread is what happens when the

bracket-visibility is #f.  In that case, the tuplet number is placed as
if there were a bracket, and since that bracket is placed quite far from
the beam in cross-staff situations, the result is awful.

In the current thread, however, the brackets are visible, and the
results are still awful, and exactly because the brackets themselves are
placed ridiculously.

Even if the issue in this thread would be fixed, the tuplet numbers in
the references thread would be misplaced.

they probably are related -- the only reason i turned the tuplet brackets on in this case was because i originally couldn't find the tuplet numbers on a very cursory inspection when typesetting this piece. turning the brackets on enabled me to find the numbers and i left them on because i couldn't think of a good place to put the numbers. if you turn the brackets off in this case, then numbers are still in weird places.

--
Do not meddle in the affairs of trombonists, for they are subtle and quick to anger.