Re: why you don't contribute to Mutopia

[Phil Hézaine]

Le 04/01/2014 13:27, Federico Bruni a écrit :
> 2014/1/2 Phil Hézaine <address@hidden>
>
> > 2. Licenses
> > > Currently Mutopia accepts only transcriptions licensed as public domain,
> > > CC
> > > By, CC By-Sa:
> > > http://www.mutopiaproject.org/legal.html
> > >
> > > I don't know what led to this decision, but I can imagine that at least CC
> > > By-Sa-Nc would be preferred by some.
> >
> > And what about Free Art License which is recommended by the Free Software
> > Foundation. IMHO it's really a Free license.
>
>
> I don't know if it adds much to what the licenses above provide.
> Simplification is a good principle...

"Art Libre a fait le choix du libre; Creative Commons a fait celui du 
libre choix."

The structure of Art Libre is Copyleft.
One big difference is the acknowledgement of the Berne's Convention.
The Free Art License is effective in all the countries which signed up 
these agreement.
So far it is not the case for CC License (I don't know for CC 4.0).

There are also discussions about a compatibility between CC and FAL (or 
LAL = Licence Art Libre).

http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0/Compatibility

 Potential compatible licenses
FAL

In CC's view, FAL 1.3 is a strong candidate for two-way compatibility 
with BY-SA 4.0. Discussions are currently underway that we hope will 
allow remixing between two similarly-spirited but currently separate 
islands of content. We are working through details of what adjustments 
may need to be made in order to accomplish this goal. We will be vetting 
those fully with our communities between now and d3 (draft3). It is 
possible that some tweaks may needed to be made to our licenses to make 
that happen, affecting current drafting. In terms of operationalizing 
such a statement on the CC side either through a reference in the 
license itself or inclusion on our existing (empty) webpage [link], this 
is an open question that will be addressed once more progress is made. 
For now, d2 contains the same compatibility language as 3.0 and 
maintains the definition of Creative Commons Compatible License and 
structure.

Cheers.
Phil.