[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: snippet: standard staff sizes
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: snippet: standard staff sizes |
Date: |
Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:25:55 -0500 |
Going in the other direction, I took integer-valued Lilypond staff sizes, and
found examples in my personal library which matched:
8 (~2.8mm): Boosey & Hawkes full score of “Peter Grimes” is just a little
bigger (~8.5)
10 (~3.5mm): study scores like Universal’s “Bluebeard’s Castle” and Warner
Bros. “An American In Paris”
11 (~3.9mm): Boosey & Hawkes full score of “West Side Story”
14 (~4.9mm): Kalmus Schubert Mass
15 (~5.3mm): Schirmer Barber “Complete Choral Works”
17 (~6mm): Peters Brahms “Lieder”, International “40 French Songs”
18 (~6.3mm): Musikvissenschaftlicher Verlag’s M ̈orike Songs (Wolf)
19 (~6.7mm): an average of keyboard+vocal (e.g., 18.5 for Warner Bros.
“Sweeney Todd” piano-vocal score, 19.5 for Henle’s Beethoven Sonatas)
20 (~7mm): some piano music like International Skryabin Preludes
On Jan 6, 2014, at 9:28 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider <address@hidden> wrote:
> Thanks Kieren, very interesting indeed.
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Re: snippet: standard staff sizes, Martin Tarenskeen, 2014/01/06