[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Experiences from voice handling wanted
From: |
Peter Bjuhr |
Subject: |
Re: Experiences from voice handling wanted |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:14:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Hi Gilberto!
On 01/16/2014 10:44 AM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Hmm, something is wrong, the first chord of my code is not being shown (at
least here at Nabble)
Hmm, strange problem with pasting the code...
On 01/16/2014 10:36 AM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
When engraving music that has only occasionally two or more voices (such as
your example), I personally prefer to explicitly write all voices together
at once [...]
Thanks for sharing your preferred method! I think this normally is a
good option in cases like this, and perhaps what most people would use.
In my present case I must import the music via musicxml2ly because it's
a piece I wrote previously in Finale (which I'm now going to finish and
engrave in LilyPond).
I think I'm going to use the method I sketched with partcombine and if
there occasionally are more than two voices per staff I will fix it
using your method in addition; but any other thoughts are very welcome!
Best
Peter
Re: Experiences from voice handling wanted, Michael Rivers, 2014/01/16