Re: how close are we to having an "addAt" or "insertAt" feature?

[Werner LEMBERG]

> Found another worthwhile optimization making a difference
> (basically, not discarding and regenerating a blob that is going to
> get analyzed next anyway).  In your use case where almost all
> changes happen in the same large file, this does make a bit of a
> difference, in particular regarding the system time (probably mostly
> expended on file reads).
> 
> address@hidden:/usr/local/tmp/wortliste$ time ../git/git blame wortliste 
> >/dev/null
> 
> real  4m18.314s
> user  2m59.460s
> sys   1m16.784s

Impressive!


    Werner