Re: consolidate code

[Phil Holmes]

OK - so this "tiny" example is 107 lines of code.  I don't believe this is the absolute minimum that this can be reduced to to make the point - it's too complex for me to understand.  If you want help with this it's your job (not anyone else's) to reduce it to the absolute minimum that shows the problem.  Please do that, and then hope that someone can help.  We're looking for code of something like 10 lines maximum, not over 100.

--
Phil Holmes

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: MING TSANG

To: -Eluze ; lilypond-user mailinglist

Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 9:07 PM

Subject: Re: consolidate code

From:	Eluze
Subject:	Re: consolidate code
Date:	Tue, 11 Feb 2014 11:57:54 -0800 (PST)

---

MING TSANG wrote
> I hope the attached .ly file qualifies as tiny snippet.

>>certainly not - please reduce it to one or two notes to show the >>unexpected
>>behavior, and define clearly what you'd expect!

I reduce the six variables to three; six bars note to 3 bars. I want to demonstrate the problem and what I expect. I expect all numbers on top of solfege ( s, so; f, fa).    

> Any help or suggestion is appreciated.  I don't know scheme code. I do not
> under what the code is doing except they display numbers or solfege. 

>>you could at least specify where the code you use is coming from!

I don't recall where and when I got the original code. It was since v2.15 not v1.15 as I mention on my original post.

>>thanks!
>>Eluze

Here is the revise .ly and .pdf

---

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user