Re: [SPAM] Re: midi2ly doesn't follow time signatures (beat divisions)

[David Kastrup]

Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:

> Am 20.02.2014 10:22, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Am 20.02.2014 03:09, schrieb Paul Morris:
>>>> For what it's worth, if anyone is looking for ways to improve
>>>> midi2ly, the first footnote of this blog post:
>>>> http://blog.steinberg.net/2014/02/development-diary-part-the-fifth/#fn-523-1
>>>>
>>>> notes that midi2ly does not follow the beat divisions of the time
>>>> signature when it decides how to represent tied notes (or rests):
>>>
>>> Yes, the very best response to such a post would be to comment on it
>>> in a few weeks reporting that we have fixed the issue ;-)
>>
>> Indeed.  We don't have any people working dedicately on midi2ly
>> currently I think.
>>
>
> I opened midi2ly.py today for the first time, and it seems to be small
> enough to be understood. I hope to get the chance to take a closer
> look at it.

Go for it!

-- 
David Kastrup