Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?

lilypond-user

From:	Pierre Perol-Schneider
Subject:	Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?
Date:	Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:50:19 +0100

2014-03-13 17:43 GMT+01:00 David Nalesnik <address@hidden>:

I have no objections to posting it on the LSR, but I think there should be warnings about its limitations there.

'copy that.

Cheers,

~Pierre

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Fwd: Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, Matthias Hüsken, 2014/03/13
- Re: Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2014/03/13
  - Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, Matthias Hüsken, 2014/03/13
  - Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, David Kastrup, 2014/03/13
    - Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2014/03/13
    - Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, David Nalesnik, 2014/03/13
    - Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, Pierre Perol-Schneider <=
    - Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, David Nalesnik, 2014/03/13
    - Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, David Nalesnik, 2014/03/13
    - Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, David Nalesnik, 2014/03/13
    - Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, David Kastrup, 2014/03/14
    - Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, David Kastrup, 2014/03/14
    - Re: Ragged right for contents but not staff?, David Nalesnik, 2014/03/15