[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Certain accidentals
From: |
Paul Morris |
Subject: |
Re: Certain accidentals |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:29:26 -0700 (PDT) |
Urs Liska wrote
> So actually it's _this_ part that's causing the confusion: a notehead on
> the first staff space can represent an f, a fes, a fis - or even a
> completely different pitch governed by the clef or a generally active
> transposition. In that sense musical notation is highly ambiguous.
Indeed. Should anyone be interested in learning about a less ambiguous
approach, kindly allow me to refer to Clairnote, an alternative music
notation system: http://clairnote.org/ It has a 1-to-1 mapping between
staff position and pitch (rather than 1-to-many).
-Paul
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Certain-accidentals-tp161597p161637.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: Certain accidentals, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Certain accidentals, Brian Barker, 2014/04/18
- Re: Certain accidentals, Urs Liska, 2014/04/18
- Re: Certain accidentals, Brian Barker, 2014/04/18
- Re: Certain accidentals,
Paul Morris <=
- Re: Certain accidentals, David Kastrup, 2014/04/19
- Re: Certain accidentals, Christ van Willegen, 2014/04/19
- Re: Certain accidentals, Urs Liska, 2014/04/19
- Re: Certain accidentals, David Kastrup, 2014/04/22
- Message not available
- Re: Certain accidentals, Brian Barker, 2014/04/19
- Re: Certain accidentals, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/04/19
Re: Certain accidentals, Paul Morris, 2014/04/18