[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position
|
From: |
Gilberto Agostinho |
|
Subject: |
Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position |
|
Date: |
Tue, 22 Apr 2014 07:35:20 -0700 (PDT) |
David Kastrup wrote
> I should think that using a large negative padding and/or
> minimum-distance would create constant positions for the last system, at
> the cost of potential overlaps/off-paper stuff.
Yes, that's what I was looking for, David! Thanks a lot!
Take care,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Orchestral-score-bottom-staff-position-tp161720p161755.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position, (continued)
- Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position, Urs Liska, 2014/04/22
- Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position, Gilberto Agostinho, 2014/04/22
- Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position, Gilberto Agostinho, 2014/04/22
- Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/04/22
- Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position, Gilberto Agostinho, 2014/04/22
- Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/04/22
- Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position, Gilberto Agostinho, 2014/04/22
- Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position, Kieren MacMillan, 2014/04/22
- Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position, Gilberto Agostinho, 2014/04/22
- Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position, David Kastrup, 2014/04/22
- Re: Orchestral score: bottom staff position,
Gilberto Agostinho <=