Re: [Frescobaldi] Re: Mac testers needed for Frescobaldi!

[Paul Morris]

jeff235 wrote
> On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 2:46:08 PM UTC+2, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> 
>> Or just communicating with the QuickTime synthesizer directly?
> 
> Sure, whatever works. (I just thought the combination I mentioned sounded 
> better.)

 
+1, especially if MIDI playback that works "out-of-the-box" is just as easy
(or easier?) to do than getting Frescobaldi to see the MIDI ports provided
by SimpleSynth or FluidSynth (the current problem).


jeff235 wrote
>> That may not be a bad idea.  But then how would you handle Lilypond 
>> upgrades? 
> 
> People could always install newer versions and add them in Preferences > 
> LilyPond Preferences. Frescobaldi already handles multiple versions of 
> LilyPond intelligently, which is helpful.

Yes, and also wouldn't it work to just include a new stable release of
LilyPond in a new release of Frescobaldi?  At least for those who are using
the stable releases.  

Or I just saw Urs' message with a different idea...

At any rate this could be a future addition (in one way or another) after
the initial "1.0" release of the mac app bundle.

-Paul



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Mac-testers-needed-for-Frescobaldi-tp161735p162609.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.