[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is there a translator from LilyPond to XML?
From: |
Jacques Menu |
Subject: |
Re: Is there a translator from LilyPond to XML? |
Date: |
Wed, 21 May 2014 22:50:05 +0200 |
Hello Dennis,
I use Photo Score Ultimate (which I bought as part of a Sibelius bundle) to
scan PDFs and sheet music, it’s worth its price in my opinion.
This allows exports as MusicXML. Never tried it this way though, since I first
export to Sibelius to fine tune the score before obtaining MusicXML to be
imported in LP.
So creating a PDF score with LP can lead to MusicXML in this setup.
JM
Le 21 mai 2014 à 21:36, pls <address@hidden> a écrit :
>
> On 21.05.2014, at 21:19, Alex Loomis <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I was under the impression MuseScore had Lilypond import and XML export
> IIRC MuseScore v0.9.5 had a very basic and experimental LilyPond import
> function but they dropped it. They will also drop their LilyPond export
> function in the upcoming version 2.0.
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 21, 2014, at 2:18 PM, pls <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 21.05.2014, at 18:44, Dennis Clason <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have a publisher interested in some of my work, but they want it in
>>>> their house style. They know about LilyPond, but it's "a fringe market
>>>> they are watching" (their words). Their preference would be for me to
>>>> submit in Finale or Sibelius, but I'm not interested in re-entering the
>>>> entire score. I'm also not interested in spending way more than I'd ever
>>>> make on the project to buy a copy of Finale (or Sibelius).
>>>>
>>>> They have said that XML would also be okay.
>>>>
>>>> And that's the history and reasoning for my question. My Google-fu
>>>> unearthed a XML to Lilypond translator, but is there one that goes the
>>>> other direction?
>>> Right now the only way to translate LilyPond files to MusicXML is to scan
>>> your PDFs (or PNGs…) with OMR software. Unfortunately these programs are
>>> also quite expensive and the resulting files need to be corrected. The
>>> extent of needed corrections depend on the complexity of your scores and
>>> the software. You could give Audiveris v4.3 (free & open source) a try but
>>> your scores are bound to suffer severe losses...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Dennis
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> lilypond-user mailing list
>>>> address@hidden
>>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> lilypond-user mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user