RE: One of these things just isn't the same

[Daniel Rosen]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Holmes [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 4:00 AM
> To: Phil Holmes; Daniel Rosen; address@hidden
> Subject: Re: One of these things just isn't the same
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> To: "Daniel Rosen" <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 8:25 AM
> Subject: Re: One of these things just isn't the same
> 
> 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Daniel Rosen" <address@hidden>
> > To: <address@hidden>
> > Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 9:35 PM
> > Subject: One of these things just isn't the same
> >
> >
> >> \version "2.19.7"
> >>
> >> { f4-> fis-> fes-> f!-> }
> >>
> >> Why is the accent on the final note (the one with the natural sign before
> >> it) so much farther away from its parent NoteHead than the others? Is
> >> this a known issue?
> >>
> >> DR
> >
> >
> > Well, the obvious and simple answer is that it's to allow space for the
> > natural sign.  None of the other accidentals have strokes on the left of
> > the glyph.

Well, I suppose that makes sense, but it still looks Extremely Ugly to me. Does 
anyone else agree?
 
> That is: on the right.  Never was very good with left and right.

Understandable. I still have to look at my hands sometimes. :-P

DR