[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Typesetting <b bes!> chord
From: |
Keith OHara |
Subject: |
Re: Typesetting <b bes!> chord |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jun 2014 05:54:39 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Vaughan McAlley <vaughan <at> mcalley.net.au> writes:
> I prefer what Lilypond does. In some modern contexts there might be a
> diagonal stem from the B natural to the stem of the B flat, but
> leaving it out is definitely easier.
There is an example of how to draw that diagonal stem at
http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=505
but I also prefer the single-stem chord notation.
By default, LilyPond applies the usual rules for chords to this case,
and it works well. The flat is printed left of the natural, so the
natural cannot be mistaken as canceling a double flat.
I leave these clusters printed as chords, and shift the flat a little
lower, so that the accidentals are staggered, and then I recognize it
as a chord of a second without hesitation.
{ <\tweak Accidental.Y-offset #0.2 b'!
\tweak Accidental.Y-offset #-0.1 bes' >4 r4
<a'! \tweak Accidental.Y-offset #-0.4 aes' >4 r4 }
- Typesetting <b bes!> chord, Javier Ruiz-Alma, 2014/06/11
- Re: Typesetting <b bes!> chord, Vaughan McAlley, 2014/06/11
- Re: Typesetting <b bes!> chord,
Keith OHara <=
- RE: Typesetting <b bes!> chord, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2014/06/11
- RE: Typesetting <b bes!> chord, Javier Ruiz-Alma, 2014/06/11
- RE: Typesetting <b bes!> chord, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2014/06/11
- Re: Typesetting <b bes!> chord, Javier Ruiz-Alma, 2014/06/12
- RE: Typesetting <b bes!> chord, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2014/06/12
- Re: Typesetting <b bes!> chord, Francisco Vila, 2014/06/12
- Re: Typesetting <b bes!> chord, Malte Meyn, 2014/06/13
- Re: Typesetting <b bes!> chord, Werner LEMBERG, 2014/06/12
- Re: Typesetting <b bes!> chord, Malte Meyn, 2014/06/12