[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Jul 2014 16:20:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
On 6. Juli 2014 16:12:56 MESZ, Paul Morris <address@hidden> wrote:
>Uns Liska wrote
>> Some of them are good, some of them less so, I think.
>> Maybe we could start going through the existing snippets and consider
>
>> possible tags for each of them. This will make a pool of suggestions
>> where we can filter out from.
>>
>> One question I still have is: Should the tags be flat too, i.e.
>single
>> independent tags, or could there also be a hierarchy (which would
>then
>> be reflected in the documentation)?
>>
>> For example I could imagine tagging a snippet
>> markup->headers or
>> notation->rhythm->polymetrics
>
>I think non-hierarchical (flat) tags make sense, following the
>principle of
>doing the simplest thing that will do the job, in this case helping
>people
>find the files/snippets they're interested in.
>
>Starting by tagging the existing snippets sounds fine to me.
But not tagging directly but collecting suggestions first. Then decide about a
set of tags and apply them during the move.
Urs
>
>-Paul
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/openlilylib-Discuss-restructuring-tp163922p164079.html
>Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, (continued)
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/04
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Paul Morris, 2014/07/04
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Federico Bruni, 2014/07/04
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/04
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Paul Morris, 2014/07/04
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/05
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/05
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Paul Morris, 2014/07/05
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/05
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Paul Morris, 2014/07/06
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring,
Urs Liska <=
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Paul Morris, 2014/07/06
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/07
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/07
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/07
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Paul Morris, 2014/07/07
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/07
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/08
- Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Janek WarchoĊ, 2014/07/20
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Urs Liska, 2014/07/20
- Re: [SPAM] Re: [openlilylib] Discuss restructuring, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2014/07/07