Re: Question for all LilyPond users (especially power users)

[David Kastrup]

Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:

> Am 11.07.2014 09:10, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> I think the "cleanest" way with the least hassles (and maybe
>>> discussion) would be to integrate into LilyPond the _possibility_ to
>>> switch fonts (e.g. Abraham's functions) and provide the fonts
>>> independently.
>>
>> I think the salient point is to provide the infrastructure where you can
>> install a font by dropping a number of files in directories, and then
>> have a standard way of accessing them.
>>
>> The "drop a number of files in directories" part can ultimately be done
>> by using GUILEv2 functionality for downloading content via HTTP.  As
>> long as that is not in place, just unarchiving a font tar or zip file in
>> the right place would work, possibly helped with some scripts based on
>> wget or similar.
>>
>
> I'm not really sure what you mean.
> Does that mean you suggest incorporating that in the LilyPond installer?

No.

-- 
David Kastrup