Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in q

[David Kastrup]

Helge Kruse <address@hidden> writes:

> Am 13.07.2014 11:57, schrieb David Kastrup:
>
>>     <fis a d fis>4<f! a d f!>  <f a d f>  q
>> Well, just write the latter version.
> Well. this means "don't use q when you have accidentals in a chord".

Reminder or forced accidentals, it would appear.

> My example has a fourth chord. Without it the latter version doesn't
> have any q.
>
>> It appears I have
>> mentioned this when entering issue 3593 as having _also_ been discussed,
>> illustrating how important the bug squad is for not letting reports get
>> dropped silently.
>>
> So is this considered as a bug? Since #3593 is closed it should be
> recorded as a new bug?

With q, it is more of an enhancement request.  With
Completion_heads_engraver, it is more of a bug than a limitation because
you cannot really work around it.

Both are separate requests concerning separate code.

-- 
David Kastrup