Re: Accidentals on repeated notes separated by rests in certain styles

[Gilberto Agostinho]

Hi David,

Concerning the style dodecaphonic-no-repeat, I think that the current
behaviour is exactly how it should be! Sure, in your simple example above
the accidental looks superfluous, but usually the works that really benefit
from dodecaphonic-no-repeat have a much more complex musical texture. Have a
look on this example below:

<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n164485/example.png> 
example.ly <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n164485/example.ly>  

Would you say your suggestion is beneficial here?

Regards,
Gilberto



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Accidentals-on-repeated-notes-separated-by-rests-in-certain-styles-tp164462p164485.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.