[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: notation rule question
From: |
Mike Solomon |
Subject: |
Re: notation rule question |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:23:35 +0300 |
On Jul 23, 2014, at 3:19 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> "Karol Majewski" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Thanks David, but you answered an old question :)
>>
>> My current question is related to:
>>
>>
>> c4 c8 c8~ c4 c4
>>
>> vs
>>
>> c4 c8 c4. c4
>
> Jazzers would pick #1, Baroque composers #2.
>
I don’t recall seeing c4 c8 c4. c4 in any scores - I’d be curious to see who
would use that and why. The only use case I can think of off the cuff is a
compound 3/8 + 5/8 time signature. Otherwise, I think my brain would glitch if
I didn’t see the beginning of the 2nd beat in common time, irrespective of the
style.
Cheers,
MS
- Re: notation rule question, Karol Majewski, 2014/07/23
- Re: notation rule question, David Kastrup, 2014/07/23
- Re: notation rule question, Karol Majewski, 2014/07/23
- Re: notation rule question, David Kastrup, 2014/07/23
- Re: notation rule question,
Mike Solomon <=
- Re: notation rule question, David Kastrup, 2014/07/23
- Re: notation rule question, Mike Solomon, 2014/07/23
- Re: notation rule question, Christ van Willegen, 2014/07/23
- Message not available
- Re: notation rule question, Mike Solomon, 2014/07/23